Kozaneba:On the phenomenology of language
Kozaneba:On the phenomenology of language
https://gyazo.com/1e298a3b5e12e6fc9ca4e31276cd80d5
https://gyazo.com/bf914eca393310a945f13dcc65ed5d10
https://gyazo.com/6efc4cda5f328898b565ca15f9080fff
---
https://gyazo.com/5a5006c63b2de9c773731b68f1d2cd79
https://gyazo.com/d54db476c6318dad5c345e0681fc3963
https://gyazo.com/10f4f64153667dde331f33783f2293ab
---
https://gyazo.com/a2fbb216b12d061764554b39b59a0ffe
https://gyazo.com/c1c61bac61f52f08d5bbbb83207f2dc3
2021-12-12
https://gyazo.com/1227e09f771487adfb4856a441c0eed8
https://gyazo.com/2a323706f8b936819649efe13d48073f
https://gyazo.com/c310ed3bd505d08e718d7aa568710204
https://gyazo.com/652667dc404bd463e8eaf9a0dcf9c340
https://gyazo.com/7b5b8ba1dc0db703fd9be35a7d0a9168
https://gyazo.com/168c9a04636b5cbffc1ba628e06a59e1
It's not quite as exciting as it usually is, because the felt sense isn't forming.
I couldn't remember the term "phrenology of language."
Thought is a private phenomenon without language, it becomes an intersubjective value through language, and then it acquires an ideational real existence
What is the difference between Merleau-Ponty and Hussar?
I feel lost reading this now.
I just realized.
/nishio/kei.iconWhat is it that you value?
/nishio/human.iconYou're talking about why I'm trying to understand Husserl, because Eugene Gendlin's ideas were very much in line with my practical purpose, which was to focus on how to put the unverbalized into language, so I was studying that, and I was studying the Merleau-Ponty text that he was introducing me to. I ordered and read the Merleau-Ponty text that he was referring to, and it was a commentary on Husserl and then a development of Husserl's commentary, so I decided to experiment with that as a test bed and try to use Kozaneba to go through the process of reading and understanding a difficult book.
I think this is a very important thing to say.
I mean, I wanted to know the context of Merleau-Ponty's To express is to be aware that Eugene Gendlin quoted, so I bought the book. I didn't want to know about Hussar.
I didn't read the introductory part of Husserl and feel "I don't get it", rather I "get it", which is why I tried to verify it with Keichobot.
However, the story did not expand, appropriate questions were not asked, and I could not speak well even in listen first mode, because I did not have the impetus in me to speak.
As soon as we get to talking about Eugene Gendlin, he's talkative, because there are so many hooks here.
For the subject who speaks, to express is to be aware. He does not express himself merely for the sake of others. He expresses in order to know for himself what he is aiming at.
This is precisely the difference between Husserl and Merleau-Ponty that was not answered when asked
Husserl believed that "the meaning of words comes first, and then we use them to express ourselves," rather than "we try to express ourselves with words, and thereby create meaning."
The purpose of expression at this time was to communicate to others.
Merleau-Ponty, however, said that it is the acquisition of meaning by us that is relied upon, not only when communicating to others
In this context comes "For the subject who speaks, to express is to be aware. p.119
To express is not to transmit an idea to others.
So it's not that the felt sense hasn't been formed, but that the right questions haven't been asked.
I know more than I can tell you."
Possibly related.
2021-12-14
https://gyazo.com/7856774079ab385ae9ed71abd83b725c
https://gyazo.com/50ebb42ae826363d021a637c957e3cb8
language phenomenon
double task
Quasi-physicality of [meaning
Relationship between what is meant and what is meant Precipitation
https://gyazo.com/5321aa4dad4f93baedcd1e5834037772
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Kozaneba:言語の現象学について. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.